I didn't notice it right away in the gallery with the dark color scheme And the photo is good, it looks like a toy composition... Oleg Fisherman, well, the anonymous one has been revealed Although the work should be recognizable
Mesmerizing... but something's really missing: the stars, the skyscape. Maybe I should have taken it in the evening?
grimy, taken above the Arctic Circle, at an altitude of about 400 meters + heavy cloud cover, practically overhead. I saw the stars once in five days)))
Author, this was taken above the Arctic Circle, at an altitude of about 400 meters, with heavy cloud cover. I wonder where the light is coming from; it's not evenly distributed yet. If it's not a secret, could you tell me?
Serg Dav.,
No, it's not a secret. The light is from tourist spotlights. It's already completely dark.
And the other one isn't up for the competition? Too bad... I didn't figure it out, I thought they were both up for the competition. I gave that one a 10 and this one a 9, so she'd get more points. ))) Well, your work is guaranteed first place anyway.
Magnificent! At first, I thought it was a miniature executed with exceptional skill. But after reading the comment (where is it?), I'm even more impressed.
But I think that someone or something animate would destroy this fabulous state... So there is that very fairy-tale mysticism... Amazing photo and "Bravo" to the author!
What makes you think I don't like women's butts, Mr. Aandreev? Do you have any assumptions about my sexual preferences? But you're right about one thing: I really don't like and get very irritated when photography ignoramuses clutter websites with "butts": ... although the difference between the two is incomprehensible to you... it seems.
I'll ignore the rest of this ass-photographer's nonsense; I'm too lazy to drag this boob-and-piss-sufferer by the sweaty ear.
mordofot, don't get annoyed, you're so predictable.
You have an exhibition of photographs from the Finnish War at the Military Library in St. Petersburg – go and discuss it if you're not scared. And since we're raising the issue of preferences and suffering, it seems you really do have problems.
Smart people talking nonsense can "irritate" me... try to figure out for yourself why you, Mr. Aandreev, don't "irritate" me at all. I'll ignore the rest of the ass-fucker's nonsense; I'm too lazy to drag the sweaty ear of the boob-pussy-sufferer.
mordofot, Oh, come on) You must have been bullied as kids))) You've been trolling for so many years, and you haven't come up with anything new) It's always been ass, ass, and ass. And you don't keep your word =
I'll ignore the rest of this ass-fitter's nonsense
You're a pathetic troll, go browse your dictionary.
Mr. Aandreev, I strongly recommend studying the "ABC Book" (a book about letters) as an external student, learning how to put letters together into syllables, and studying THIS:
Great postcard
And the photo is good, it looks like a toy composition...
Oleg Fisherman, well, the anonymous one has been revealed
Although the work should be recognizable
taken above the Arctic Circle, at an altitude of about 400 meters + heavy cloud cover, practically overhead. I saw the stars once in five days)))
I'd be happy to see stars too
No, it's not a secret. The light is from tourist spotlights. It's already completely dark.
Spotlights.
Made me want a cake or pastry right away!
sugar house:)
Drawing isn't our method. Only seeing and photographing!
If it were an 11, I would give it... Excellent work!
I like that photo better too, that's why I showed it earlier. I just prepared this one for the contest.
Well, your work is guaranteed first place anyway.
...I really need to try creating something like this on my table
It's unclear why this is, though: there's nothing unique about the work except the location itself.
If only there was color... but there wasn't.
And where is that?
Arctic Finland.
They probably have something like that in Karelia too
"work" is great.
And first place is 100% deserved.
Thank you!:))
It happens...it happens in many places...
Yeah, that's what people were raving about on the site before, and what they're raving about now...
The progress is clear.
Keep enjoying the sight of fly poop smeared across the glass.
But you're right about one thing: I really don't like and get very irritated when photography ignoramuses clutter websites with "butts": ... although the difference between the two is incomprehensible to you... it seems.
I'll ignore the rest of this ass-photographer's nonsense; I'm too lazy to drag this boob-and-piss-sufferer by the sweaty ear.
You have an exhibition of photographs from the Finnish War at the Military Library in St. Petersburg – go and discuss it if you're not scared.
And since we're raising the issue of preferences and suffering, it seems you really do have problems.
I'll ignore the rest of the ass-fucker's nonsense; I'm too lazy to drag the sweaty ear of the boob-pussy-sufferer.
Oh, come on) You must have been bullied as kids)))
You've been trolling for so many years, and you haven't come up with anything new) It's always been ass, ass, and ass.
And you don't keep your word = You're a pathetic troll, go browse your dictionary.
DILETANTISM - engaging in any activity, such as science, art, or craft, without the necessary knowledge and professional training. In modern usage, the understanding often goes something like this: an amateur lacks in-depth knowledge of the subject matter, and therefore makes mistakes. Typically, this is a person who limits their knowledge to their own experience, or whose judgments about something are based on superficial knowledge. ©
POSHLOST - the dictionary of the modern Russian language gives the concept of "poshly" several definitions, most of which have a negative connotation. "Poshly" is not only "banal," "tasteless," "low in spiritual and moral terms," but also "vulgar," even "indecent." The ancient meanings of this concept: "former," "long-standing" - are practically lost in modern language; however, they reflect the evolution of conceptual meanings in a historical perspective.
"Poshly" is a popular Russian word derived from the verb "poit" (to go): "vulgar" - "has been going on since ancient times." But this meaning dates back to pre-literate antiquity, when it characterized, first of all, the "normal course of life." By the beginning of the 15th//1st century, the concept of "vulgar" had acquired the meanings of "trivial, low-grade," which testified to "society's break with pre-Petrine tradition" (V. Vinogradov).
The new meaning of the concept was also entrenched in Russian literature of the 15th//1st-19th centuries. After Peter the Great's reforms, there was an intensive rethinking of the categories of Western, primarily German classical philosophy. It was at this time that a tendency toward a convergence of the concepts of "vulgar" and "rational" (reason and intellect) emerged, reflecting "ontological realism" and fundamental anti-rationalism of the original Russian thought, associated with Orthodoxy and Slavophilism. “The philosophy of reason considered itself the philosophy of mind,” wrote A. Khomyakov about Hegelianism. Pure rationalism was identified in Russia with rational thinking: it was contrasted with the entire divine reason, faith (V. Zenkovsky) and life itself (V. Solovyov, V. Rozanov). Important aspects of the understanding of Hegelianism by Russian Westernizers also included reflections on the phenomenon of “rationally calculated being,” common sense, reducible to the banal, that is, “vulgar” formula two times two is four (N. Stankevich, T. Granovsky, F. Dostoevsky, I. Turgenev). Revolutionary democrats considered German philosophers from Kant to Hegel to be a “shortcoming” "vulgarity" of their general conclusions, while the ideas themselves seemed quite "deep, fruitful, and majestic" (N. Chernyshevsky).
In the striving of reason, guided by common sense, for a "rationally calculated being," Russian religious thought discerned a movement toward progress, which, in the words of K. Leontiev, would clearly "vulgarize life." In the 20th century, the "vulgarity of civilizing knowledge," which N. Berdyaev associated with the "end of Europe," was transformed by D. Merezhkovsky into a metaphysical category - into absolute non-existence, which in Russia was associated with the philosophical understanding of the bourgeoisie as the kingdom of vulgarity ("anthill," "golden mediocrity"). Russian national The idea, filled with chaos and infinity, was fundamentally alien to the concept of relativity and the idea of the middle ground, which T. Mann called the German national idea. And if in the German interpretation, "vulgar" is nature from the standpoint of spirit and freedom, then from the Russian perspective, "vulgar" seemed to be a rational understanding of nature, life, the Divine principle itself.
Revolutionary thought in Russia, directed against the "bourgeois" way of life, based on "vulgar" common sense, tried in its own way to combat it through violent revolutions. However, for Russian religious thought, this path was again rational, inherited from the West, and therefore also "vulgar." The only true way to overcome the vulgarity of reason remained the constant labor of the soul—the spiritual—as asserted by S. Bulgakov and other religious thinkers. Asceticism, on the path to "complete divine reason." ©
"Vulgarity has tremendous power; it always catches a new person off guard, and while he is surprised and looking around, it quickly entangles him and takes him into its clutches." © M. E. Saltykov-Shchedrin.
SYNONYMS - banality, tabloidness, vulgarity, tacky, hackneyed, worn-out, barrack-like, kitsch, strawberry, cranberry, indecency, obscenity, indecency, indecency, baseness, Petrosyanism, flatness, pop music, obscenity, smut, triviality, philistinism. ©
VULGARITY - one of the negative qualities that accuses a person of lacking taste. Sometimes used as an antonym The concept of beauty.©
BAD TASTE is always an imitation of something that once shone with the radiance of authenticity, and was subsequently copied and polished until it sank to the very bottom. ©
TASTE is a personality trait acquired through proper upbringing and successful socialization. Accordingly, bad taste is the result of flaws in upbringing and poorly implemented socialization. As they say, parents, educators, and society failed to instill taste and failed to shape the child's correct understanding of symmetry, harmony, and beauty.©