Ignat Safronov, and I can't even handle 3 (42 species? 3.14 here is a complete mess! I'm a noob at photography, but I don't have that many! What I see here is a "still life"
Architectural landscape, Baroque landscape, Military landscape, Heroic landscape, Mountain landscape, Urban landscape, Decorative landscape, Country landscape, Idyllic landscape, Impressionistic landscape, Industrial landscape, Intimate landscape, Historical landscape, Chamber landscape, Classical landscape, Cubic landscape, Lyrical landscape, Marine landscape, Memorial landscape, Monumental and decorative landscape, Monumental landscape, National landscape, Panoramic landscape, Park landscape, Wild landscape Nature, mood landscape, landscape of individual places in a country, landscape-pano, landscape of primitivists, landscape of compassion, romantic landscape, rural landscape, symbolic landscape, social (public) landscape, narrative (or narrative-narrative) landscape, topographic, factographic landscape, "private" landscape, pure landscape, expressive landscape, epic landscape. V.M. Sokolinsky
Dmitry_61, Wow, now explain how an academic classification (completely idiotic and useless, in fact), which concerns painting specifically, relates to photography. Of course, photography is also a fine art, but it has nothing to do with painting, more likely with poetry. And look in my comments for what I said about the crisis of this genre in photography. I think it's here -
Complete and utter garbage—nothing special. Pisage is just that, pisage!!! True. And there it's divided into subtypes. Well, I can still imagine a still life. But what you wrote is complete nonsense!
utter nonsense – nothing special. Pisage is pisage!!!
Yes, pisage is pisage, no matter where you are. Some works are liked, others disliked, and tomorrow it's the other way around. Levitan is remembered for his generalized images of nature, while Shishkin was criticized for the excessive photographic quality of his works. In art, everything is so fluid, and everyone can have their own point of view – hence styles, movements, schools, -isms, and so on. Everything is always in flux....
What is a landscape? According to the academic version, there are about 37 types...
Ignat Safronov, and I can't even handle 3 (42 species? 3.14 here is a complete mess! I'm a noob at photography, but I don't have that many! What I see here is a "still life"
V.M. Sokolinsky
True. And there it's divided into subtypes. Well, I can still imagine a still life. But what you wrote is complete nonsense!
Some works are liked, others disliked, and tomorrow it's the other way around.
Levitan is remembered for his generalized images of nature, while Shishkin was criticized for the excessive photographic quality of his works.
In art, everything is so fluid, and everyone can have their own point of view – hence styles, movements, schools, -isms, and so on.
Everything is always in flux....
And "Sweet Couple" got some PR here too
I think it's beneficial for everyone...