Okay, but I think it's too academic; I'd like some space on the sides.
Lenni, This isn't academic, it's amateurish. The clutter reveals the lack of thought in the painting. A stool should be used to correct the perspective; it creates a completely different view. How long can we keep making the same mistakes, comrades?
I like the work! A photo is not a drawing, and the distance isn't always as perfect as you'd like. I think a level streetlight, emphasizing the building's even center, would be sufficient here, but that's just my opinion.
Evgeny (EV6795), that's just awesome! I've never seen anything like it. But! They said it right above, people are getting ready for winter! Well spotted!
Evgeny (EV6795), simply superb! I've never seen anything like it. But! They said it right above, people are getting ready for winter! Well said!
Kerim, you're forbidding me to write? Oh well. I just listened.
Alex Nikifor, why write under this work? At least come to my page! And I'm not forbidding you to write anything. Write whatever you want, but think before you write!
An interesting little temple, especially the combination of white and green, which unites two seasons, winter and summer, and hence it can be given a new name, Winter-Summer
Mono, Good evening No, there was no rudeness. If it was written specifically about me, about the photo, no problem. I'll take any criticism and am open to normal communication. But another person was also mentioned in the comment, which I think is wrong. Otherwise, I'm happy to chat. And definitely no ill will, I'm smiling
Evgeny (EV6795), I was just hinting that your photo is very similar to a photo that is not distinguished by the sophistication of the composition and the depth of the image...
Mono, I get the hint. But I think using a link to another person in the context of the page is incorrect. You could have simply written, "Your photo lacks sophistication in composition and depth in its imagery..." It's all so simple and clear
Evgeny (EV6795), ok. But I didn't provide any links.
Mono, I'm not talking about links. Such a mention might be unpleasant for someone. Why...? Write to me whatever you think is necessary. I'll read it and use it rationally
Thank you!!!!!
Sasha, thank you!!!!
Thanks!!!!! I agree
Thank you!!!!! I appreciate your comments
Well spotted!
Kerim, thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Pavel, thank you!!!!!!!!
Thank you!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you! I'm glad!
Thanks! I'm glad!
Thank you so much!!!!
Irina, thank you so much!!!!!!!!!!!
Slava, thank you!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Thank you so much!!!!
Ilona, thank you!!!!!! I agree, I don't want winter at all.
Good evening
No, there was no rudeness. If it was written specifically about me, about the photo, no problem. I'll take any criticism and am open to normal communication.
But another person was also mentioned in the comment, which I think is wrong. Otherwise, I'm happy to chat.
And definitely no ill will, I'm smiling
explained why below
And regarding the harmfulness—that's an interesting theory
Well, good evening!
I get the hint. But I think using a link to another person in the context of the page is incorrect.
You could have simply written, "Your photo lacks sophistication in composition and depth in its imagery..."
It's all so simple and clear
I'm not talking about links. Such a mention might be unpleasant for someone. Why...? Write to me whatever you think is necessary. I'll read it and use it rationally