Ignat Safronov, oversharpening, then... you're setting yourself up, sir... you're not aware of the trends, you don't follow the development of photography.
Ignat Safronov, I wasn't being rude, so it's unlikely the administrators will delete the post. And I'll decide what to show off. Kysya, don't worry, we'll sort everything out now.
I'm taking it out, I'm not shy. As for writing, you understand, anything you write won't count towards your score. Kisses - agreed - we'll cut it off. And as for the rest - don't judge me - I'll write. Well, you're wrong, you're wrong.
Backwoods, Scarily beautiful! Impressive! Even the "noble don" was impressed. This photography "guru" can only produce nonsense, but at least he claims to be a genius. Now your followers will come calling and tear you down for your poor behavior and disagreement with the opinion of someone "widely known in the photography world."
Backwoods, Terribly beautiful! Impressive! Even the "noble don" was impressed. This photography "guru" can only produce nonsense, but he claims to be a genius. Now your followers will come running, they'll tear you apart for your poor behavior and disagreement with the opinion of someone "widely known in the photography world."
Kotachev, what's so beautiful? The man will either puke or fall asleep.
Kotachev, what's so beautiful? The man's either going to puke or fall asleep.
"Terribly beautiful!" that's more accurate. At least this isn't a typical portrait. It's better to ask the author himself what program he used, and whose school he's trying to master.
Mad Fishmonger, As far as I understand, you also love to experiment and create, and have achieved impressive results in this. All the more surprising to hear you criticize the author's work in the same way. I wouldn't want to think that this situation is like the joke: "Then I don't care which way your hat is pointed!"...
Safronov isn't just an "elitist" photographer, he's also a very thick and cunning troll. I don't understand why people have been so angry at him and feeding him their negative emotions for so long For those who don't know what trolling is, Wikipedia is your friend. And stop entertaining him with your messages, be reasonable P.S. I liked the work!
Safronov isn't just an "elitist" photographer, he's also a very thick and cunning troll. I don't understand why people have been so angry at him for so long and feeding him their negative emotions.
For those who don't know what trolling is, Wikipedia is your friend. And stop entertaining him with your messages; be reasonable.
P.S. I liked the work!
samos, the best way to deal with boors is to simply delete their messages. Go to Safronov's "author wrote" column—almost half of the messages have been deleted.
Mad Fishmonger, well, it's time to answer: 1. You don't need to tell me what to do. That entails an answer in terms of where you should go. 2. What to do? You'll tell your wife and children, if you have any. 3. If you feel like saying anything else, stand in front of a mirror and dump it out there. It usually helps; try it on yourself. And look at yourself, too.
ash, in any case, take a broader view. Wider than your own little world. Acquirer magazine... well, it's unlikely to say anything, but at least take a look... broaden your horizons, you understand?
Actually, the Mad Fishmonger is a girl. You're behaving inappropriately, comrade. You were told the portrait didn't turn out well. Your job is to ask why. And then you immediately started throwing poop and lecturing. And you've been spouting complete nonsense at Ashu. Believe me, he knows and can do more than you. In short, keep grinding away...
Backwoods, you barely even noticed this Esquire. Compare for yourself. This is a serious magazine and they take editing very seriously. There was another work on the same day: Compare and feel the difference.
Mad Fishmonger, well, it's time to answer: 1. Don't tell me what to do. That entails an answer in terms of where you should go. 2. What to do? You'll tell your wife and children, if you have any. 3. If you want to say something else, stand in front of a mirror and dump it there. It usually helps; try it on yourself. And look at yourself.
Backwoods, thanks, I laughed) Don't tear your butt from the effort.
ash, you're far from the first to suggest feeling the difference, despite being completely out of touch. What am I supposed to compare with the photo in the link? Do you like that photo? Well, just look at it, why are you shoving links at me? Don't you understand that not everything you don't understand is bad? Let me put it simply: an artist paints a picture, for example, and then you come along and declare, "You know, there was a Leonardo before Vinci" (or Dali, or Malevich (link follows) - look and feel the difference. Silly.
alexnik, are you a lawyer? Stupidity is punishable regardless of whether it comes from a man or a woman. Here's the response: "Backwoods, thanks, I had a good laugh) don't tear your butt from the effort." Smart, what can I say.
Why should I believe you? I see Ash's photos in his gallery. If you think this is skill and knowledge—well, maybe it's yours. Look and enjoy, what do I owe you? And what's with your manner of dispensing sermons? You're not an authority. Well, gnaw on your own granite, compare, and feel the difference.
Don't you understand that not everything that you can't understand is bad?
Backwoods, you still haven't grasped the essence of the complaints. If you like portraits with the pores exposed, go for it. Your photo is oversharpened. It's severe. The dots glow, the contours glow. The skin has lost its midtones, divided into dots and lines. And this is a flaw in the processing, not style or vision. You got carried away and lost your sense of proportion. This is no longer a face - it's a stamping.
ash, to which I immediately replied - yes, I like it, otherwise I wouldn't have posted it. If something is unusual for you, it doesn't mean it's "oversharpened," "overexposed," etc. Everything is in Proluton's place.
ash, I immediately responded to that - yes, I like it, otherwise I wouldn't have posted it. If something is unusual for you, it doesn't mean it's "oversharpened," "overexposed," etc. Proluton is all there.
Backwoods, how do you relate sharpening (aka oversharpened, aka increased microcontrast) to midtones?
And I'll decide what to show off. Kysya, don't worry, we'll sort everything out now.
Scarily beautiful!
Impressive!
Even the "noble don" was impressed. This photography "guru" can only produce nonsense, but at least he claims to be a genius.
Now your followers will come calling and tear you down for your poor behavior and disagreement with the opinion of someone "widely known in the photography world."
"Terribly beautiful!" that's more accurate.
At least this isn't a typical portrait. It's better to ask the author himself what program he used, and whose school he's trying to master.
As far as I understand, you also love to experiment and create, and have achieved impressive results in this.
All the more surprising to hear you criticize the author's work in the same way.
I wouldn't want to think that this situation is like the joke: "Then I don't care which way your hat is pointed!"...
The mustache, eyes, lips, nose—everything is so razor-sharp it hurts the eyes.
More attention is paid to skin pores than to "look"
For those who don't know what trolling is, Wikipedia is your friend. And stop entertaining him with your messages, be reasonable
P.S. I liked the work!
There are only three options here: either clarify what's wrong, laugh it off, or remain silent. Anything else is stupid, to say the least.
Go to Safronov's "author wrote" column—almost half of the messages have been deleted.
1. You don't need to tell me what to do. That entails an answer in terms of where you should go.
2. What to do? You'll tell your wife and children, if you have any.
3. If you feel like saying anything else, stand in front of a mirror and dump it out there. It usually helps; try it on yourself. And look at yourself, too.
You're behaving inappropriately, comrade. You were told the portrait didn't turn out well. Your job is to ask why. And then you immediately started throwing poop and lecturing.
And you've been spouting complete nonsense at Ashu. Believe me, he knows and can do more than you.
In short, keep grinding away...
There was another work on the same day:
Don't you understand that not everything you don't understand is bad? Let me put it simply: an artist paints a picture, for example, and then you come along and declare, "You know, there was a Leonardo before Vinci" (or Dali, or Malevich (link follows) - look and feel the difference. Silly.
Stupidity is punishable regardless of whether it comes from a man or a woman.
Here's the response: "Backwoods, thanks, I had a good laugh) don't tear your butt from the effort." Smart, what can I say.
Why should I believe you? I see Ash's photos in his gallery. If you think this is skill and knowledge—well, maybe it's yours. Look and enjoy, what do I owe you?
And what's with your manner of dispensing sermons? You're not an authority. Well, gnaw on your own granite, compare, and feel the difference.
Your photo is oversharpened. It's severe. The dots glow, the contours glow. The skin has lost its midtones, divided into dots and lines. And this is a flaw in the processing, not style or vision. You got carried away and lost your sense of proportion. This is no longer a face - it's a stamping.