I'm watching this for the second time, and as far as I understand, it's the second version... I'd like to say something specifically to the author... stop looking at standard, hackneyed views... it won't lead to anything good... find your own, your own perspective... try, make mistakes, listen to comments, and try again... it's difficult here - when you open the landscape feed, it's very difficult to distinguish one author from another, to see the fundamental difference in the works... everyone takes pictures of what's "pretty" without thinking... http://www.anseladams.com/ look here, for example...
No, it's the same version, rebooted due to a glitch in the FC. ...I'd like to say something specifically to the critic: I shoot different landscapes, from different angles and with different processing; if you take a closer look at my work, you might be surprised. It's not a given that what you like will resonate with everyone; everyone has a different idea of beauty and aesthetics. Thanks for the link.
Alekseenko Aleksey Nikolaevich, We are all a long way from Adams. He's a good example, but I stand by my opinion... There are many of us, but he's one...
Vladimir Tomsky, but is it better to learn from those who are far away than from those who are easy to reach?
No, it's the same version, rebooted due to a glitch in the FC. ...what I'd like to say specifically to the critic: I shoot different landscapes, from different angles and with different processing; if you take a closer look at my work, it's not a given that what you like will evoke positive emotions in everyone; everyone has a different idea of beauty and aesthetics. Thanks for the link.
Svetlaya, I'm not a critic... I'm a viewer... It's not about angles or editing... it's about approach, you could say... it's easiest to follow the beaten path... don't worry about the majority; popular culture is mostly kitsch, crudely crafted... after all, you don't shoot to please the majority, but to convey your view of the world, your perception of it, to create something of your own... and if it's the other way around, your photos will join millions of similarly standard, unrecognizably beautiful ones... do you need that? After all, each of us is an individual, a personality, a unique organism, and judging by most works, they're churned out by faceless robots who have laid the foundations of proper composition and 10-20 processing processes.
And if my work joins millions of similarly standard, black-and-white, murky, processed, mysterious, and creatively imitative works, similar to someone else, will that make you feel better, dear photo critic? Is it worth forcing your approaches and vision on other photographers? Let all flowers bloom, as they say in China... For some reason, I have no desire to advise you to shoot differently or be like someone else...
And if my works join millions of similarly standard-looking, black-and-white, murky, processed, mysterious, and creative works, similar to someone else, will that make you feel better, dear photo critic? Is it worth forcing your approaches and vision on other photographers? Let all flowers bloom, as they say in China... For some reason, I have no desire to advise you to shoot differently and be like someone else...
Svetlaya, you're going to extremes... I'm not forcing anything on you... it's your path... whatever you want, black-and-white or color... but in your own way... and you're like everyone else now... good luck.
http://www.anseladams.com/ look here, for example...
...I'd like to say something specifically to the critic:
I shoot different landscapes, from different angles and with different processing; if you take a closer look at my work, you might be surprised. It's not a given that what you like will resonate with everyone; everyone has a different idea of beauty and aesthetics.
Thanks for the link.
For some reason, I have no desire to advise you to shoot differently or be like someone else...