Author, "Criticism is the examination of something from the point of view of well-defined criteria to determine whether it meets or does not meet these criteria." Would you like to clarify the criteria?
That's a superstition! The Earth is round too! There's a bird, there are boats, there are mountains, the sun is setting, the sea is splashing! What a mood! Don't tell altimona, about the joke, that would be FD! Anyway, enjoy it before I delete it)))
Author, well, you can't put FD in your pocket... but the comments will be a keepsake!.. And the smell of the ocean is wafting out of the monitor... awesome!))
VladM, by the way, I constructively criticized about the point being lowered from ten - that's where the golden ratio is (well, to put it more simply, the "rule of thirds") I know, they explained to me here that to harmonize the image, the horizon needs to be in golden ratio
Yes, what a bunch of photography experts have gathered here today... Fans of triangular connections and "the bleating of a lamb on its deathbed...."... What kind of photography is it without metaphysics?...... Natural beauty is alien to you.... Ha-ha...-ha-ha (comma with a pause), ha-ha...-ha-ha! (a pun...) Hello - Mono!
I'll be brief and constructive))) I'm a proponent of Southeastern constructive criticism. So, here's the deal. You need to get rid of the spammers on this page. They won't tell you anything useful. Let's start from top to bottom: road sign expert, dacha fountain expert, Irish single road expert, cat in curly pillows expert, knocked-out hedgehog expert, water fetching expert, quiet sunset expert, and, well, the undecided shovel expert)))) Who are these people?! I personally don't care about them. And I don't care about you either! Because: and I don't care what the author knew or didn't know. I see a picture, and it either excites me (me personally, and I don't care about anyone else, including the author) or it doesn't, regardless of what the author did or wanted to do. (C) To excite, you need! Repaint the boat red and straighten it out. White, blue, red. That's it! And no Marlezon ballets! And no sunsets in the photo! Only sunrises! As a sign of reason rising above the elements! Correct that quickly, I just gave you constructive advice. And write in the description: "Artistic photography." Without that, you'll never get anywhere!
Bend the seagull! Nose left, tail right, so everyone can see the Moscow Art Theater sign in their foreheads.
Victor Titorenko, who did I support, besides the author and your mood?) Haven't seen you in a while, nice to meet you) I'm fine, my leg just hurts from the fracture... and how are you?
There's no need to criticize anything here - everything is wonderful. The sunset, the sea, the rocks, the boats, the bird... the whole package for a masterpiece. I recommend it in Works of the Day.
No need to criticize anything here – everything is wonderful. The sunset, the sea, the rocks, the boats, the bird… the whole package for a masterpiece. I recommend it in Works of the Day.
PDG, You can't scare me like that! I almost fell off my chair before I saw the letter (c)! Thanks everyone for the constructive criticism, especially for the southeastern approach! I'll take note of your mistakes, I'll ask the seagull to fly correctly, and the sun not to set but to rise optimistically! usn, This is Liguria, I've been there, nostalgia!!! There's so much more I want to see!!! BBA, Alexey Nikolaevich Alekseenko, Thank you especially for the positive feedback! That's how criticism should be!
..There's a bird, there are boats,... Don't say altimona, about the joke, that would be FD!..
Author, no need for these insinuations! And please don't fall off your chair! - get used to distinguishing quotes from uncopyrighted text - after "The Name of the Rose," you were planning to switch to "Foucault's Pendulum" - the skill will come in handy))
usn, he's undecided about shovels, I never noticed any uncertainty in you before - thanks, as always, to the kind PDG - it opened my eyes you've finally pulled yourself together, or something
PDG, Dear PDG. It's good etiquette when quoting to include the author or, at a pinch, a link to the original source. You (and others like you) trolled Anrew Kud quite well, and just yesterday you were singing his praises. I think this should give us a lot to think about. And the original source is here, comment #10:
Andrew Kud, You're welcome. Well, what was I saying? Everyone does their own PR—some troll, some seek the truth—and yet their ratings keep growing. That doesn't apply to you. I just really don't like hypocrites who "lie down" every day where it's easier to be honest. By the way, all their trolling is very boring, monotonous, and rude. But trolling a truth-seeker is a lot harder when even the most... trolls mistake you for one.
Bluejay, Oh, come on! Why should you care who's stroking their ego here and how? Talk exclusively about pictures, if you so desire. But don't deprive others of the pleasure of chatting about this and that. Many people don't come here for photos at all: to fluff up their wings, try on a pretty dress (in real life, it's nothing), exchange everyday news, brighten up loneliness, and compensate for a lack of communication. Understand this, and you'll immediately feel better. You need to interact with people in a humane way. This isn't America: our way of life is different, softer, and much less formal. Strictness and tolerance are not for us. Don't look for that here. Better leave, so you don't have to torment yourself every time. Do you need that? Or are you just drenched in honey here? Go to Line, for example. ZhdastLuk is there—you'll be in wonderful company. You'll move mountains there together trying to find the truth, chase away the honey-producers and other groups. By the way, most people will like your pictures there.
Bluejay, You're emitting an excessive amount of nervous energy. My worn-out body can't handle such pressure. It's even fading away its cognitive function.
"For excitement! Repaint the boat red and trim it. White, blue, red. That's it! And no more Marlezon ballets! And no sunsets in the photo! Only sunrises! As a sign of reason rising above the elements of the universe!"
...an excited dawn rose over the little red boat...
I wouldn't wave a saber like that. And I wouldn't be so categorical about it with F. Mikhalych. He was never known for stupidity. By anyone. *** You just have to understand what he meant by "beauty." And then it will become clear that it was beauty alone that saved, if not the entire world, then at least Rus'—from one asshole after another. There was simply no one else and nothing else to do.
PDG, Dear PDG. It's good etiquette when quoting to cite the author or, at a pinch, provide a link to the original source. You (and others like you) trolled Anrew Kud quite well, and just yesterday you were singing his praises. I think this should give us a lot to think about.
Ehb Bluejay, Bluejay,
I think in your case it's pointless advice – I look at the book and see a fig.
Andrew Kud, and who now uses it in the understanding of Dostoevsky? He could have said kindness, love and other virtues, but he combined it into one word, succinctly, beautifully, but it is lost for most
Andrew Kud, It's just that PDG still hasn't realized, like most people on this site, that I'm playing a role, but on the other side, to create "some kind of intrigue," to raise interest and ratings for a particular author's work, event, etc. on the site, choosing the image of "fighting for justice, equality, etc." I think the role was a success. And I understand the hints, the meaning between the terms, etc. very well, otherwise my performance would not have been a success.
Andrew Kud, It's just that PDG still hasn't realized, like most people on this site, that I'm playing.
Bluejay, how come you haven't realized, if you never tire of repeating it almost every day? A "game" doesn't become a "game" just because you decide so. From the outside, everything looks different.
Bluejay, You know the story about the boy who made fun of the whole village by shouting, "Wolves! Wolves!?" Well, eventually he stopped finding it funny. The wolves ate him....
PDG, Trusting your intuition and analytical mind, I'd like to ask: do you think the title of today's flash mob has anything to do with the film of the same name? If not, why only three colors instead of seven? Perhaps we should be preparing for red next Friday? Or is it about RGB?
ytrewq, Well, if everything is taken on faith, then I think I play well.
Bluejay, I don't think anyone takes this seriously anymore. Stop this childish nonsense. Although I know it's pointless asking you to, right?) You haven't played enough yet.
ytrewq, From the outside, it looks like you're playing with yourself... I forgot what that term was...
tramp, That's pretty much what it looks like. And screw the terminology.
Do you think the name of today's flash mob has anything to do with the film of the same name?
tramp,
It doesn't. And, in general, all that's left of flash mobs are their names.
By the way, I just read Sergey Kudryavtsev's review of the film "Three Colors: Blue"
"Being a Catholic and possessing a rational mind, Kieślowski harbored not only a Slavic soul and a penchant for sincere empathy for the fates of lost heroes, but also a touch of philosophical cunning, a healthy adventurism, and a penchant for intellectual pranks. He nevertheless renounced straightforward interpretations of the tricolor symbol, stating, for example, that "Three Colors: Blue" is, in fact, a story about love, which still makes a person unfree."
Here's a photo, one of the few from today's flash mob that you can look at.
Here's a photo, one of the few from today's flash mob that's worth examining
PDG, and I won't skimp on the adjectives and say that this picture is the best thing I've seen on this site in the month I've been hanging around here.
No! Rat!
(That's more constructive))
I'll delete it, let the unappreciated beauty go to waste.
don't take my cues))
???
Author, exactly, "beauty." And also "nostalgia"!
he's one of "our own" according to Alexey Krik's classification
Nobody complained - the site admins themselves)
(Or rather, I have a specific question,
but that's just in case
Author, who's going to ask you?))
There's a bird, there are boats, there are mountains, the sun is setting, the sea is splashing! What a mood!
Don't tell altimona, about the joke, that would be FD!
Anyway, enjoy it before I delete it)))
Takprosto, what's wrong with you? Look at the feed... tens are flying out in flocks!...and here...a masterpiece!
Takprosto, there's a bird, there's a sunset...the author was here...the rest doesn't matter!]
Fans of triangular connections and "the bleating of a lamb on its deathbed...."...
What kind of photography is it without metaphysics?......
Natural beauty is alien to you....
Ha-ha...-ha-ha (comma with a pause), ha-ha...-ha-ha!
(a pun...)
Hello - Mono!
And the landscape is beautiful!
Long time no see....
How's your health?
I'll be brief and constructive))) I'm a proponent of Southeastern constructive criticism. So, here's the deal. You need to get rid of the spammers on this page. They won't tell you anything useful. Let's start from top to bottom: road sign expert, dacha fountain expert, Irish single road expert, cat in curly pillows expert, knocked-out hedgehog expert, water fetching expert, quiet sunset expert, and, well, the undecided shovel expert)))) Who are these people?! I personally don't care about them. And I don't care about you either! Because:
and I don't care what the author knew or didn't know.
I see a picture, and it either excites me (me personally, and I don't care about anyone else, including the author) or it doesn't, regardless of what the author did or wanted to do. (C)
To excite, you need!
Repaint the boat red and straighten it out. White, blue, red. That's it! And no Marlezon ballets!
And no sunsets in the photo! Only sunrises! As a sign of reason rising above the elements!
Correct that quickly, I just gave you constructive advice. And write in the description: "Artistic photography." Without that, you'll never get anywhere!
Bend the seagull! Nose left, tail right, so everyone can see the Moscow Art Theater sign in their foreheads.
Your choice of spitting is extremely unusual.
Why spit on those you don't care about?
IMHO
Just like that – straight to the point!
Haven't seen you in a while, nice to meet you)
I'm fine, my leg just hurts from the fracture... and how are you?
Get well soon!
Thanks everyone for the constructive criticism, especially for the southeastern approach!
I'll take note of your mistakes, I'll ask the seagull to fly correctly, and the sun not to set but to rise optimistically!
usn, This is Liguria, I've been there, nostalgia!!! There's so much more I want to see!!!
BBA, Alexey Nikolaevich Alekseenko, Thank you especially for the positive feedback! That's how criticism should be!
You're nowhere to be found. Not in my ex-photos, not on Facebook.
You're nowhere to be found.
And please don't fall off your chair! - get used to distinguishing quotes from uncopyrighted text - after "The Name of the Rose," you were planning to switch to "Foucault's Pendulum" - the skill will come in handy))
usn, he's undecided about shovels,
I never noticed any uncertainty in you before -
thanks, as always, to the kind PDG - it opened my eyes
you've finally pulled yourself together, or something
And the original source is here, comment #10:
And for raising his rating by increasing his citation index - THANKS. What's so bad about that?
Oh, come on!
Why should you care who's stroking their ego here and how?
Talk exclusively about pictures, if you so desire. But don't deprive others of the pleasure of chatting about this and that. Many people don't come here for photos at all: to fluff up their wings, try on a pretty dress (in real life, it's nothing), exchange everyday news, brighten up loneliness, and compensate for a lack of communication. Understand this, and you'll immediately feel better.
You need to interact with people in a humane way. This isn't America: our way of life is different, softer, and much less formal. Strictness and tolerance are not for us. Don't look for that here. Better leave, so you don't have to torment yourself every time. Do you need that? Or are you just drenched in honey here?
Go to Line, for example. ZhdastLuk is there—you'll be in wonderful company. You'll move mountains there together trying to find the truth, chase away the honey-producers and other groups.
By the way, most people will like your pictures there.
You're emitting an excessive amount of nervous energy. My worn-out body can't handle such pressure. It's even fading away its cognitive function.
This phrase is as beautiful as it is stupid.
I wouldn't wave a saber like that. And I wouldn't be so categorical about it with F. Mikhalych. He was never known for stupidity. By anyone.
***
You just have to understand what he meant by "beauty." And then it will become clear that it was beauty alone that saved, if not the entire world, then at least Rus'—from one asshole after another. There was simply no one else and nothing else to do.
I think in your case it's pointless advice – I look at the book and see a fig.
You'll get a separate citation for that "Eh, b" [word]. And it serves you right!
Just not in the face)))
You know the story about the boy who made fun of the whole village by shouting, "Wolves! Wolves!?"
Well, eventually he stopped finding it funny. The wolves ate him....
Post #1
tramp, That's pretty much what it looks like. And screw the terminology.
It doesn't. And, in general, all that's left of flash mobs are their names.
By the way, I just read Sergey Kudryavtsev's review of the film "Three Colors: Blue"
"Being a Catholic and possessing a rational mind, Kieślowski harbored not only a Slavic soul and a penchant for sincere empathy for the fates of lost heroes, but also a touch of philosophical cunning, a healthy adventurism, and a penchant for intellectual pranks. He nevertheless renounced straightforward interpretations of the tricolor symbol, stating, for example, that "Three Colors: Blue" is, in fact, a story about love, which still makes a person unfree."
Here's a photo, one of the few from today's flash mob that you can look at.
and I won't skimp on the adjectives and say that this picture is the best thing I've seen on this site in the month I've been hanging around here.
I disagree with these conclusions!))) One of the best would be more correct!
I'm talking about myself. This isn't a conclusion, but an impression. How can you agree or disagree with it?
Sometimes I think you won't even need a horse to take Troy))))
Joke)))
And don't offend Alexey Krik, or I'll troll you)))
I never even thought about it. Krik and I have known each other for a long time. We know each other well.
Funny.
Okay, that threat didn't work, I need to change tactics.
...., otherwise I'll fall out of love)))