Vovik, why is it always so dark for you? Maybe it's a creative technique, but in my opinion it's a flaw, a technical flaw. The theme is covered, the lighting seems fine, the pose is fine, but damn, you can't see a thing. Is this really beautiful?
Look at this - this is yours:
http://i009.radikal.ru/0712/25/e87e6ee3a350t.jpg And this is with the curved line applied. Yes, there's posterization and jagged halftones - but that's loss due to processing and compression. A properly exposed photo won't have it.
Putrach, mmm, well, I'm just a fan of dark photos))) although maybe my monitor doesn't show it quite right... But I'll get around to reading it anyway))
Vova, don't pay attention. If you make it lighter, the rule will be followed. Rules are meant to be broken when you can see them. =) That's my opinion.
Vovik, I like the photo itself, but it's really dark! I liked Mr. Putrach's version (the first version) much better... But that's just my humble opinion.
Thanks everyone, but I actually like this dark photo... I don't know about others, but everything looks good on my monitor... everything is visible normally... Thanks everyone for the recommendations and also for the criticism
super
Excellent work... ten
Look at this - this is yours:
http://i009.radikal.ru/0712/25/e87e6ee3a350t.jpg
And this is with the curved line applied. Yes, there's posterization and jagged halftones - but that's loss due to processing and compression. A properly exposed photo won't have it.
http://i048.radikal.ru/0712/a3/ee970972296at.jpg
Vovik, you can't live on honey plants alone. Read up on exposure and the histogram.
But I'll get around to reading it anyway))
Vova, the photo is good, very beautiful, but it's very dark... lighter... please.
If you make it lighter, the rule will be followed.
Rules are meant to be broken when you can see them. =) That's my opinion.
http://i034.radikal.ru/0712/fa/4a069e21ebe4t.jpg
And Putrach +1 ))))
But that's just my humble opinion.