Beautiful! And I didn't get there. I didn't have time. Crimea turned out to be much bigger than I thought....
Oleg Danilhenko, So, you'll get there next time, Oleg!) Honestly, I haven't visited everything in Crimea yet, even though I live here...))) Every time I discover something new...)
Oleg Danilhenko, So, you'll get there next time, Oleg!) Honestly, I haven't visited all the places in Crimea yet, even though I live here...))) Every time I discover something new...)
Olga Dan, Now next year, but for now, back to Karelia...if only the weather holds up...
Olga Dan, Now next year, but for now, back to Karelia....if only the weather holds up....
Oleg Danilhenko, Karelia is beautiful in any weather, Oleg! Here I also encountered rain and cloudiness, but it's even better than just clear weather...) Good luck in Karelia, Oleg!)
Everyone's talking about the place (as if it were a travel website), but not the photo itself. There's a processing flaw here. View crop The small format, 800x530, doesn't work.
Everyone's talking about the place (as if it were a travel site), but not the photo itself. There's a processing flaw here. The cropping option The small format, 800x530, doesn't work.
Old Diver, I could have used a larger format, but when I uploaded a larger one, they asked for a smaller one, because it wouldn't fit on the monitor...) Regarding the processing flaw, I'd like more details. The photo went through strict moderation and was accepted both for stock photography and for posters. Perhaps something went wrong during compression—the original is huge.
Olga! The foreground looks "collage-like." (I need to work on my technique!) Good luck!
Viktor Bukhrov, Wow...and the moderators didn't mention that!))) I need to write to them so they'll be stricter!) I listen to all the advice. Thank you, Viktor!) And it's not a collage.
Olga Dan, This particular picture has a clear flaw – it's the border between the bushes and the sea. Bukhrov also wrote to you about this. It looks like a poorly cut and pasted appliqué. Perhaps this isn't in the stock picture, otherwise those "strict moderators" are worthless.
Olga Dan, This particular picture has a clear flaw – it's the transition between the bushes and the sea. Bukhrov also wrote to you about this. It looks like a carelessly cut and pasted applique. Perhaps this isn't present in the stock image, otherwise those "strict moderators" wouldn't be worth a dime.
Old Diver, Yes, this phenomenon isn't visible in the original at a large size. But in backlighting, the glow of the trees against the sea is still visible, even if only slightly. Processing helps, but it's not critical at all, as it's natural, as long as it's within acceptable limits and not too glaring.
Olga Dan, what's hidden under the bush in the original?)
Vlad, We can see it there...) Come over - let's go and see it together!!!) And we'll take my photo for identification...) It didn't "hit" me - it's about the glow - the tree nearby is dry - there's no glow on its branches, but conifers, and other deciduous trees, have a protective reflective film on their surface to protect them from the sun, which is what creates this effect when backlit. Photoshop helps with that.
Vlad, We can see it on site...) Come over - let's go and see it together!!!) And we'll take my photo for identification...) It wasn't "eye-catching" - it's about the glow - the tree nearby is dry - there's no glow on its branches, but conifers, and other deciduous trees, have a protective reflective film on their surface to protect them from the sun, which is what creates this effect in backlighting. Photoshop helps with that.
Viktor Bukhrov, Wow...and the moderators didn't say that!))) I need to write to them so they'll be stricter!) I listen to all advice. Thanks, Viktor!) And it's not a collage.
Olga Dan, I'm sure it's not a collage, that's why I wrote that it "looks" like a collage. Take a closer look at the work, as if from the outside. And the light border above the greenery also needs to be retouched. Good luck!
Olga Dan, I'm sure this isn't a collage, that's why I wrote that it "looks like a collage!" Take a closer look at the work, as if from the outside. And the light border above the greenery also needs retouching. Good luck!
Viktor Bukhrov, Thank you, Viktor, for your opinion. I'll definitely take your recommendations into account!
There's a processing flaw here. View crop
The small format, 800x530, doesn't work.
Regarding the processing flaw, I'd like more details. The photo went through strict moderation and was accepted both for stock photography and for posters.
Perhaps something went wrong during compression—the original is huge.
It looks like a poorly cut and pasted appliqué.
Perhaps this isn't in the stock picture, otherwise those "strict moderators" are worthless.
It didn't "hit" me - it's about the glow - the tree nearby is dry - there's no glow on its branches, but conifers, and other deciduous trees, have a protective reflective film on their surface to protect them from the sun, which is what creates this effect when backlit. Photoshop helps with that.